According to an online announcement by an anti-vaccine proponent and whistleblower named Neil Z. Miller, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control (CDC) is reported to have hatched a plan to make sure that ALL CHILDREN are supposed to be up to date with their scheduled vaccinations, whether they are vaccinated or unvaccinated.
Here are the actual words of Mr. Miller: “The CDC has just launched a program that will calculate a catch-up schedule for children who were not vaccinated on schedule. A 5-year-old child who was not previously vaccinated would be required to receive 19 vaccines in one month, including 6 doses of aluminum-containing injections. This catch-up schedule was NOT tested for safety to determine the immediate or long-term risk of neurological or immunological damage.”
Nineteen vaccinations in 1 month for a 5-year-old child?! Whoever thought a child could survive that must be nuts? Remember that all vaccines carry a small but dormant portion of the original debilitating disease it was named for. Vaccines are also known to create not just harm to the body but provide fatal or near-fatal diseases.
According to Mr. Miller’s reports, a CDC table of vaccinations required in the catch-up program has been approved by the following professional and scientific organizations:
American Academy of Family Physicians – www.aafp.org
American Academy of Pediatrics – www.aap.org
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologist – www.acog.org
Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices – www.cdc.gov/vaccines/acip
Could this latest schedule of the CDC be another ploy for them to implement mandatory vaccination?
Higher Number of Vaccinations Equals Higher Number of Infant Deaths
In 2011, Miller and his co-author Gary S. Goldman published a paper propounding the fact that the countries with the highest number of vaccinations on their schedule were the same nations that had the highest number of infant mortalities.
Using a number of tables, the two researchers found out that the number of infant deaths appeared to synchronize with the number of vaccinations being delivered in each country. Thereby, the lower the number of vaccines being recommended in a country, the lower the number of children’s deaths.
They somehow concluded that infant mortality, which is the number of infant deaths per 1,000 births, in 2009 was much better in 33 countries than the United States, according to the US Central Intelligence Agency (CIA).
They determined that in 2009, a total of 26 vaccine doses were recommended for children under the age of one in the U.S. They compared the number of vaccines administered in each country with the number of infant deaths. They found out that the U.S. had the highest number of recommended vaccinations resulting in the highest number of infant deaths.
Since 2009, the U.S. vaccination schedule endorses a total of 56 injections of 73 doses of 30 different
Multiple Vaccinations in a Child in One Visit may be Fatal
Does one need further proof that having multiple vaccinations administered to a child, even an infant, at only one time may not just be dangerous to the life of a young child but may also be fatal to him/her?
To prove this point, Miller and Goldman gathered data from the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) website where they were able to establish that the more vaccines a child receives at any given time, the higher the chances the child could experience an adverse reaction to it.
Combining Childhood Vaccinations in One Visit is Potentially Life-Threatening
In September 2016, Miller published a paper titled “Combining Childhood Vaccines at One Visit Is Not Safe”.
It is a summary of a previous study by Miller and his co-author, Goldman. Using data taken from the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) website, they were able to show that the more vaccines a child received at any given time, the more likely an adverse reaction could occur.
They wrote that: Of 38,801 VAERS reports they analyzed, 969 infants received 2 vaccine doses at one time prior to an adverse event, and 107 of those infants were hospitalized, representing a hospitalization rate of 11%. Of 1,959 infants who received 3 vaccine doses at one time prior to the adverse event, 243 or 12.4% of them required hospitalization. Those who receive four vaccines before the adverse event, 561 of 14.4% of 3,909 infants were hospitalized.
Obviously, there is a pattern here: the infants who had more vaccines received at one time are more likely the ones to suffer a serious adverse reaction to the vaccines.
There have been numerous deaths among infants attributed to the administration of multiple victims to an infant at one time. The case of six-month-old Bently Neathery who died 5 days after being administered a total of 13 vaccines at only one time in 2015 illustrates the dangers children and infants face from all these toxic vaccines disguised as the ultimate protection against dangerous and debilitating diseases.
My advice is to forego the vaccines and just work on keeping yourself healthy through a balanced, all natural, plant-based diet and lots of exercises. If you keep yourself healthy, then you don’t need to inoculate yourself against vaccines that are manufactured from sometimes dubious, inactive dangerous ingredients.
What do you think of this story? Do you agree with the CDC to administer multiple vaccines to a baby at only one time? Share your ideas in the comments below!